{"id":2374,"date":"2020-01-13T23:50:00","date_gmt":"2020-01-13T23:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/?p=2374"},"modified":"2020-01-13T23:50:00","modified_gmt":"2020-01-13T23:50:00","slug":"oscars-2020-nominations-little-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/2020\/01\/13\/oscars-2020-nominations-little-women\/","title":{"rendered":"Oscars 2020: Nominations, Little Women"},"content":{"rendered":"

So, we\u2019ve barely finished singing Auld Lang Syne and already the Oscar nominations are here. Depressingly, Todd Philips\u2019 empty Joker leads the way, with eleven nominations, but in a sign that the trend towards spreading the awards out evenly may continue, three other films earned ten nominations each (1917, The Irishman and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood) and a further four earned six nominations.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a run-down of the nine Best Picture nominees \u2013 seven of which I have already seen at the time of writing!<\/p>\n

Ford v Ferrari<\/strong>. Workmanlike and engaging, but definitely here to make up numbers. Will likely win nothing at all. Review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Irishman<\/strong>. A huge achievement, if not quite Scorsese at his very best, then certainly enthralling and beautifully acted. Review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Joker<\/strong>. As noted, I didn\u2019t like it. Review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Jojo Rabbit<\/strong>. Flawed both in concept and execution and yet frustratingly winning when it\u2019s actually on. Scarlett Johansson is luminous. Review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Little Women<\/strong>. A remarkable adaptation of a literary classic. Review below. It\u2019s a crime Greta Gerwig wasn\u2019t included in Best Director.<\/p>\n

Marriage Story<\/strong>. A somewhat slight affair that flirts with something darker and stranger, but remains resolutely real, for good or for ill. Review here. Has no real shot at Best Picture though. Review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

1917<\/strong>. Seeing it soon, will report back.<\/p>\n

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood<\/strong>. Loose assembly of short films pretending to be a feature. Some of those short films are awfully good though. Apparently I neglected to review this when I saw it, for which apologies.<\/p>\n

Parasite<\/strong>. Opens in the UK on 7 February.<\/p>\n

As to predictions \u2013 my hunch is that Best Picture<\/strong> and Best Director<\/strong> will be split. Best Director seems likely to go Sam Mendes way, since 1917<\/em> is the film for which it is easiest to identify the director\u2019s contribution. If we assume that eliminates 1917<\/em> from Best Picture, and we can also eliminated no-hopers like Ford v Ferrari<\/em>, Jojo Rabbit<\/em>, Little Women<\/em>, Marriage Story<\/em> and Parasite<\/em> (sorry) then that leaves us with just three. If we further assume that a Joker<\/em> backlash is coming (surely!?) then that leaves Once Upon a Time <\/em>and The Irishman<\/em>, and I think Scorsese\u2019s feels like the more substantial work.<\/p>\n

Best Actor<\/strong>, tiresomely, will likely go to Joaquin Phoenix however \u2013 backlash or no backlash \u2013 and Best Actress<\/strong> I still think will go to Renee Zellweger, although the competition is far fiercer than I imagined when I first saw the film. Best Supporting Actor<\/strong> seems likely to go to Brad Pitt (Jonathan Pryce surely doesn\u2019t have a chance and the others all have Oscars already). Best Supporting Actress<\/strong> is harder to call, with pretty much everyone in with a shout, but Johansson deserves it.<\/p>\n

And we\u2019ll do screenplays while we\u2019re here. Original Screenplay<\/strong> will go to Parasite<\/em> which will also pick up Best International Feature<\/strong>, obvs, while Adapted Screenplay<\/strong> should go to Little Women<\/em> but will actually go to The Irishman<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

So, let\u2019s talk about Little Women<\/em>. Louisa May Alcott\u2019s novel was originally published in two volumes in 1868 and 1869. As written, it is purely chronological, beginning with sisters Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy in adolescence and following them through to young adulthood (or the grave in Beth\u2019s case). The book is fairly episodic and Jo\u2019s marriage to the middle-aged Professor Bhaer is a curious development for the character.<\/p>\n

According to the estimable YouTube channel BeKindRewind<\/a>, which I cannot recommend highly enough, following the publication of the first volume, Alcott was besieged with correspondence from fans of the book, all eagerly shipping Jo and neighbour Laurie. Alcott, who had already paired oldest sister Meg up with her love match John Brooke, had no interest in marrying the strikingly independent Jo off to Laurie or anyone else, but she eventually bowed to pressure from her publisher and provided her with a husband. As cheeky snub to her fans, however, she devised the seemingly most inappropriate husband she could and ended the second volume with Jo and the Prof setting up a school together.<\/p>\n

The previous film versions of the book have all rendered it fairly faithfully and have tackled the Bhaer problem in various ways. The 1933 version which made a star of Katharine Hepburn renders the book accurately if tersely and just goes ahead and has Professor Bhaer as an older German man who inexplicably falls in love with Jo and she with him. The 1949 version is an MGM chocolate box of a movie with a much softer June Allyson as Jo (although she still cries \u201cChristopher Columbus!\u201d) at every opportunity. This Bhaer is younger and sexier, but the structural problems remain.<\/p>\n

When Winona Ryder took on Jo in 1994, the whole story became a little more grounded. This Jo isn\u2019t anything like as stylised as her predecessors, but she\u2019s also the most feminine of the three \u2013 Hepburn\u2019s is an early but very obvious example of queer coding \u2013 and she gets to choose between Christian Bale\u2019s Laurie and Gabriel Byrne\u2019s Bhaer \u2013 hubbah hubbah. So, we have historical screwball, chocolate box, sophisticated soap opera. What can Greta Gerwig do in 2019?<\/p>\n

Plenty.<\/p>\n

First of all, she\u2019s completely reinvented the book\u2019s structure. Now, we start with Jo and Bhaer in New York, creating a connection between them from the very beginning. However, unlike in the book \u2013 and previous film versions \u2013 Bhaer is not the one to suggest that Jo writes stories from her own life instead of her preposterous tales of damsels in distress. Jo takes ownership of her own creativity. From here, the film darts nimbly back and forth through time, often finding little echoes of later and earlier scenes. In the book, Beth cares for a local family even more poverty stricken than her own, and catches scarlet fever from the dying baby. The Marches fear her death is imminent but she recovers, although permanently weakened. Later, she succumbs. This double-beat feels needlessly episodic and threatens to rob the whole subplot of its tragic power. Gerwig plays the two scenes of Jo awaking in Beth\u2019s room and finding her bed empty and running downstairs back to back. Once with a joyous outcome, and once with a ghastly one. It unifies this narrative thread, taking what worked in the novel and making it a complete cinema experience.<\/p>\n

This incredibly fluid, nimble, lucid script is brilliantly handled by an exceptional cast. Meryl Streep makes an enormous amount of hardly anything, Tracy Letts is great value as Jo\u2019s publisher, Timoth\u00e9e Chalamet takes Laurie on a thrilling journey from trusted friend, to asshole to member of the family, and Laura Dern is warmth personified as Marmee. And the four March sisters are all perfectly cast, Eliza Scanlen as fragile Beth, Florence Pugh as proud Amy, Emma Watson as romantic Meg and at the centre of this delicate epic \u2013 fierce, funny, gawky, independent, heroic Saoirse Ronan as Jo.<\/p>\n

Again and again, Gerwig the screenwriter finds ways to deepen and strengthen what Alcott gave her, as well as streamlining and focusing the action. Characters manage to give each other long proto-feminist speeches, and they all sound exactly in keeping and of the period, because they are delivered so sincerely and written so thoughtfully. And Gerwig the director manages to make keeping all of these characters in focus, keeping track of multiple time periods, juggling huge variations in tone, look effortless, which it absolutely isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

While not perhaps as daring as Joker would like to think it is, or as technically formidable as 1917 undoubtedly is, this is a truly magical evocation of a much-loved classic which manages to totally reinvent it, while not losing sight of what made it so beloved in the first place. I can\u2019t wait to see what Gerwig does next.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So, we\u2019ve barely finished singing Auld Lang Syne and already the Oscar nominations are here. Depressingly, Todd Philips\u2019 empty Joker leads the way, with eleven nominations, but in a sign that the trend towards spreading the awards out evenly may continue, three other films earned ten nominations each (1917, The Irishman and Once Upon a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[25,11],"tags":[523,19],"class_list":["post-2374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-at-the-cinema","category-culture","tag-oscars-2020","tag-reviews"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5JY5l-Ci","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2374"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2378,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2374\/revisions\/2378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}