{"id":1575,"date":"2014-11-07T21:46:58","date_gmt":"2014-11-07T21:46:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/?p=1575"},"modified":"2014-11-09T15:37:21","modified_gmt":"2014-11-09T15:37:21","slug":"so-what-in-heavens-name-did-i-think-of-dark-water","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/2014\/11\/07\/so-what-in-heavens-name-did-i-think-of-dark-water\/","title":{"rendered":"So… what in heaven’s name did I think of Dark Water?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Doctor_Who_Dark_Water_review__Gender_reassignment_and_life_after_death_launch_a_challenging_finale\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Dark Water<\/em> brings up two themes which I\u2019ve touched on before \u2013 two parters and plot twists.<\/p>\n

The \u201caha\u201d moment a viewer experiences when plot elements suddenly and unexpectedly collide is delicious. It\u2019s one of the most exciting things which narrative can offer. I\u2019m not talking about surprises, and I\u2019m certainly not talking about shocks. Those can be fun too \u2013 the head under the boat in Jaws<\/em> is justly famous \u2013 but that empty startle is not as rich an experience as the plot turn which suddenly causes a re-evaluation of everything that\u2019s gone before.<\/p>\n

So a twist is more than a surprise. You can surprise a viewer simply by withholding information. Nothing could be easier. A twist has to give you the feeling that you could have worked it out for yourself, and so the art that the writer constructing the twist has to, ahem, master, is to provide all the clues needed, but somehow disguise their true meaning.<\/p>\n

Steven Moffat, for all his many and various faults as a writer, has always taken a particular pleasure in doing this, and no wonder for he is supremely able. But a really, really good plot twist doesn\u2019t depend absolutely on catching the viewer out. Really, really good plot twists stand repeated viewing \u2013 and not just because you can experience again the visceral thrill of mainlining the shocking information, but because watching the pieces assemble is as interesting as seeing them snap together, and because the twist deepens and enriches what the story is really about \u2013 rather than sitting on top of the rest of the narrative, serving as mere decoration.<\/p>\n

This episode includes three plot twists, deployed with varying degrees of success and spoiled in various ways before the episode aired. The death of Danny Pink, falling under the wheels of a stray automobile while having a telephonic heart-to-heart with Clara, does not count. Surprising, yes. Shocking, certainly. But using the term as I\u2019ve defined it above, not a plot twist.<\/p>\n

Clara\u2019s next actions are nothing short of astonishing, almost psychotic. This most thinly-drawn of all major Doctor Who supporting characters since the revival somehow seems to develop an identity only when pitched in violent opposition to the Doctor. Look how quickly she formulates her plan, look how efficiently she puts it into action, look how well she knows the TARDIS and the Doctor\u2019s habits. If Turlough had been this single-minded, Mawdryn Undead<\/em> would have been one episode long and ended the series in 1983.<\/p>\n

What follows is possibly the most dramatic, tension-filled, eye-popping Doctor and companion seen we\u2019ve ever had \u2013 except possibly for the end of Kill the Moon<\/em> of course. And when the last TARDIS key is gone, and it seems as if Clara has killed the series, or at least stalled it for a good long while \u2013 then we get plot twist number one. And in some ways, this is the feeblest plot twist of them all: it was all a dream. The lazy cop-out of lacklustre writers who paint themselves into a corner and then try and clich\u00e9 their way out. But, a familiar device can still be made fresh. The ending of Terry Gilliam\u2019s Brazil<\/em> essentially uses this same clich\u00e9 but in a way which is bone-chilling rather than cosy.<\/p>\n

And the choice here does not \u2013 as we say in improvisation \u2013 cancel<\/em> the events of the scene on the rim of the volcano. In fact, those events, as imaginary as they may have been, drive the entire narrative as well as providing us with another one of the great Doctor and companion scenes, this one full of compassion and tenderness. No, Clara, betrayal is hardly enough to turn even this chilliest of Doctors against you. Even I\u2019m growing accustomed to your face.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s of course not even a surprise that Danny Pink ends up in the same version of heaven which we have been visiting periodically, although Moffat\u2019s tendency to play fast-and-loose with logic returns here. Missy\u2019s (we\u2019ll come back to Missy) Nethersphere seems to be simultaneously in Victorian London, the command ship Aristotle in the far future, where and whenever Doctor Chang is from, and St Pauls in 2014. I hope that will be cleared up tomorrow night, but I frankly doubt that it will.<\/p>\n

After a bit of narrative vamping which was not uninteresting, but could have moved a bit more briskly (we\u2019ll come back to pacing) we get plot twist number two. The Dark Water of the title provides the perfect cover for an army of Cybermen. Now, this had been comprehensively spoiled by most of the print and on-line media, but I confess it still caught me out. Near the beginning I was wondering where the Cybermen had got two, but I wasn\u2019t quick enough to put the skeletons in their display cases and the power of Dark Water together. And by having them bust out of their tombs and then march down the steps of St Pauls, Moffat manages to reference two classic Troughton stories in the space of five minutes, and director Rachel Talalay frames it all beautifully.<\/p>\n

So then, finally, we get the identity of Missy. I don\u2019t know if I would have worked this one out for myself or not, but lots of other people did and I\u2019d already seen their guesses on-line, so the revelation wasn\u2019t scrambling my brain, it was more \u2013 okay, fair enough. And it is fair enough in my view. Michelle Gomez is an excellent actor with just the right kind of nutso malevolence to make a classic Master. I have no problem whatever with her standing alongside Delgado, Pratt, Beevers, Ainley, Jacobi and Simm (don\u2019t worry Roberts, we\u2019ll call you). Does it open the door to a female Doctor? Yes, kinda, but the series has been referring to regenerative sex-change for a while now, so it\u2019s not that big of an upset to me.<\/p>\n

Sidebar \u2013 I am in general opposed to the idea of a female Doctor, but I reckon I could be convinced by the right casting. As Steven Moffat has said before, the way that writers deal with the fact that the story they want to tell is contradicted by an earlier episode, is by the powerful and secret ploy of Making Something Up. You can do what you like, ultimately. I can\u2019t off-hand think of a woman who could do the job, but I don\u2019t think I could have conceived of a 24-year-old pulling it off before Matt Smith was cast. You do have to get the right person for the job, and because I don\u2019t think a black, 70-something, French, wheelchair bound actor would make a good James Bond doesn\u2019t make me racist, ageist, Eurosceptic, disablist or anything else. Actually, now I come to think of it \u2013 Emma Thompson would probably silence a lot of doubters. As Doctor Who, not as James Bond.<\/p>\n

And the episode builds to the traditional cliff-hanger ending \u2013 our first in quite a while. Moffat\u2019s bean-counting proved that two-parters didn\u2019t save any money and so he axed them after The Almost People<\/em>. But the real problem for watchers of the show was never that stories were too short, it was generally the case that two-parters either had about enough material for 60-75 minutes of story, and so episode one was a lot of padding; or there was enough material for a full 90 minutes of story, but it was felt necessary to keep all the good stuff for part two, which was consequently rather frantic while episode one, again, was a lot of padding.<\/p>\n

And the pace does slow once we reach the Nethersphere, but not disastrously so. And the finale has a luxurious 60 minutes to play out its secrets. So \u2013 it\u2019s very hard to judge at this stage because a disappointing d\u00e9nouement can sour happy memories of a suspenseful built-up. But in general, this series has been so strong \u2013 one or two ghastly lapses aside \u2013 that I\u2019m going to go ahead and award it four-and-a-half stars and sit back and watch part two in a spirit of giddy optimism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dark Water brings up two themes which I\u2019ve touched on before \u2013 two parters and plot twists. The \u201caha\u201d moment a viewer experiences when plot elements suddenly and unexpectedly collide is delicious. It\u2019s one of the most exciting things which narrative can offer. I\u2019m not talking about surprises, and I\u2019m certainly not talking about shocks. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[11],"tags":[18,19],"class_list":["post-1575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","tag-doctor-who","tag-reviews"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5JY5l-pp","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1575"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1575\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1580,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1575\/revisions\/1580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tomsalinsky.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}